5,891
edits
Board/Minutes/2023-06: Difference between revisions
→Circular Resolutions: Added results and votes: Res12 "Update the Working Group Conflict of Interest policy to extend to moderators etc." (approved), Res13 "Approve active contributor membership application #2023061510000042" (did not pass) and Res14 "For facilitating 2022 and 2023 Screen to Screen Sessions, compensate Allen Gunn $4,000" (approved)
(Added background sections to topics) |
(→Circular Resolutions: Added results and votes: Res12 "Update the Working Group Conflict of Interest policy to extend to moderators etc." (approved), Res13 "Approve active contributor membership application #2023061510000042" (did not pass) and Res14 "For facilitating 2022 and 2023 Screen to Screen Sessions, compensate Allen Gunn $4,000" (approved)) |
||
|
|-
|style="text-align: left; background: white;" | <span style="color: black;">
'''Approved''' on 2023-06-24 with '''3 votes in favour''': <u>Mikel Maron</u>, <u>Guillaume Rischard</u>, <u>Roland Olbricht</u><br>
'''1 against''': <u>Craig Allan</u><br>
''(TEXT ISSUE:<br>
''The text itself refers only to Working Group Members. This contradicts the impact of the first sentence.''<br>
''My first choice is a re-edit to change the phrase 'Working Group member' throughout to 'member' and by that change we will fix that problem.''<br>
''My second choice is wording to say 'Working Group member' includes the other roles.''<br>
''PROCESS ISSUE''<br>
''I support Sarah. We should allow wider comments on the policy update. I'd like to see it circulated as a proposed Board resolution.)''<br>
'''2 abstained''': <br>
<u>Sarah Hoffmann</u><br>''(I disagree on procedure here. This should be put before the moderators who are affected by this, at least for information, before a board vote on it is started.)''<br>
<u>Arnalie Vicario</u><br> ''(Agree with Sarah. The previous procedure included consulting with WGs. This should be discussed with the moderators as well before board vote.''<br>
''"The board on 2020-05 [[Board/Minutes/2020-05#2020.2FRes19_Adopt_Conflict_of_Interest_Policy|adopted]] the following [https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Conflict_of_Interest_Policy&oldid=7120 Conflict of Interest Policy] and [[Board/Minutes/2020-05#Voting|decided]] to consult the [[Working_Groups|Working Groups]] (WGs) if there should be a Conflict of Interest policy for WGs and committees and what changes have to be made to the board CoI policy to make it applicable to these groups.")''<br>
'''1 did not vote''': <u>Mateusz Konieczny</u><br>
|-
| ''Circular by Guillaume Rischard''.
|-
|style="text-align: left; background: white;" | <span style="color: black;">
'''
<u>Sarah Hoffmann</u><br>
''(A perfect candidate for the 42 day mapping active contribution. Disagreement is only for contribution based on non-mapping activities.)''<br>
<u>Arnalie Vicario</u><br>
''(mapping days - can reapply until 42days have been reached''<br>
''project - would appreciate more documentation/details about the project. Once this is provided, it may support their application even with less than 42 mapping days.)''<br>
'''4 abstained''':<br>
<u>Roland Olbricht</u><br>
<u>Mikel Maron</u><br>
''(I'm abstaining. They are very much on track to reach 42 days which would make approval automatic.)''<br>
<u>Mateusz Konieczny</u> ''<br>
''(Thanks for your mapping activity so far! For the application here:''<br>
''1) there is no clear verifiable info about activity other then editing''<br>
''2) editing will give automatic approval soon)''<br>
<u>Craig Allan</u><br>
''(The applicant has put in a lot of work recently. They will reach 42 days in about 3-4 weeks at the current rate. At which point membership is automatic. There is no evidence of other work, organising the community etc, which would warrant early membership.)''<br>
'''1 did not vote''': <u>Guillaume Rischard</u>
|-
| ''Application initially processed by the [[Membership_Working_Group|Membership Working Group]]''.
|-
|style="text-align: left; background: white;" | <span style="color: black;">
'''Unanimously approved''' on 2023-06-28 with '''7 votes in favour''': <u>Roland Olbricht</u>, <u>Arnalie Vicario</u>, <u>Guillaume Rischard</u>, <u>Sarah Hoffmann</u>, <u>Mikel Maron</u>, <u>Mateusz Konieczny</u> ''(though doing it in the proper order (before job was done, not after it) would be preferable and more clear. In this case I would agree that it is a good idea, but it could be worse, risky and more complicated if that would not apply)'', <u>Craig Allan</u> ''(Ok. We can do that. It is a little confusing having someone working apparently pro-bono and then being given a gratuity in appreciation. But this is not the place to discuss that. We can pick it up later.)''
|-
| ''Circular by Mikel Maron''.
| |||