Working Group Minutes/SWG 2010-12-16
- cmarqu: Colin Marquardt
- TomH: Tom Hughes
- twain47: Brian Quinion
- rweait: Richard Weait
- zere: Matt Amos
- Firefishy: Grant Slater
- RichardF: Richard Fairhurst
- filbertkm: Katie Filbert.
- chrisfl: Chris Fleming
- Members failed to propose or object to previous minutes.
- Next IRC Thursday, 06 January 2011 1500UTC
- At the 13 January 2011 meeting this meeting was declared non-quorate. No official minutes.
(10:00:55 AM) rweait: *** Shall we start logging? *** (10:05:39 AM) rweait: What do you think? Should we give folks another ten minutes to arrive? (10:13:08 AM) Firefishy [~email@example.com] entered the room. (10:16:38 AM) rweait: Anybody care to propose and second the minutes from last meeting? http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/SWG_2010-12-08 (10:18:08 AM) RichardF [~RichardF@pod-71.dolphin-server.co.uk] entered the room. (10:20:57 AM) filbertkm [~firstname.lastname@example.org] entered the room. (10:21:13 AM) RichardF: *crickets* (10:21:28 AM) rweait: RichardF: quite. (10:22:41 AM) rweait: Anybody care to propose the minutes of the previous meeting. Second call. (10:22:48 AM) rweait: http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/SWG_2010-12-08 (10:24:08 AM) filbertkm: hi (10:24:17 AM) rweait: Hi filbertkm (10:25:17 AM) filbertkm: what's been discussed so far before i joined (10:25:42 AM) rweait: Okay we are 25 minutes past the top of the hour and have not managed to approve (or object) to the previous minutes yet. (10:26:35 AM) rweait: Anybody care to propose the next meeting date? is 23 Dec worth considering? (10:28:20 AM) rweait: Any objections to 23 December as the next meeting date? (10:29:03 AM) Firefishy: Sorry, I wasn't here for most of the last meeting so cannot propose (10:29:37 AM) Firefishy: 23rd. Eeeech... Maybe postpone? (10:29:53 AM) Firefishy: well unless most people are off, then it could be good :P (10:30:01 AM) rweait: Is the 30th any better or is that week a write-off? (10:30:33 AM) filbertkm: Dec 23 works but but I'm technically not a working group member (10:30:43 AM) Firefishy: Worse for me. 23rd I'm @ work. 30th I'm recovering from hangover :P (10:30:57 AM) rweait: filbertkm: technically the only working group member is Mikel (10:31:11 AM) filbertkm: Ah, okay! (10:32:28 AM) rweait: How does everybody feel about continuing in the format, IRC, vs. telephone? (10:32:39 AM) rweait: er, "this format" (10:33:01 AM) rweait: I'd prefer telephone. (10:33:17 AM) rweait: Or email even. (10:33:44 AM) ***filbertkm likes irc but email is good too (10:34:13 AM) filbertkm: But phone is an option (10:34:44 AM) rweait: Okay, let's go with IRC on Thursday 6 Jan 2011, and see what interest we can stir up on email in the interim. (10:35:01 AM) rweait: I move that we adjourn. in the absence of objections.... ? (10:35:55 AM) filbertkm: Sounds good (10:36:27 AM) rweait: *** adjourned - End logging *** <\pre>