5,884
edits
Board/Minutes/2024-05: Difference between revisions
→Circular Resolutions: Added votes, comments and result for "Appeal of ban on slice0" (ban remains), "Draft Articles of Association (AoA) and asset transfer to a Belgian AoA" (approved), renumbered the last request for refund circular
(→Circular Resolutions: Added 2024/Res23 "Craig Allan: Request for refund of travel costs to Frankfurt F2F 27 & 28 May 2024 ") |
(→Circular Resolutions: Added votes, comments and result for "Appeal of ban on slice0" (ban remains), "Draft Articles of Association (AoA) and asset transfer to a Belgian AoA" (approved), renumbered the last request for refund circular) |
||
|
|-
|style="text-align: left; background: white;" | <span style="color: black;">
'''
- <u>Roland Olbricht</u><br>
- <u>Sarah Hoffmann</u><br>
- <u>Mateusz Konieczny</u> <br>
- <u>Arnalie Vicario</u> ''(Would have been good to compare quotations from different service suppliers but to note that this is not a requirement stated in the current [[Budgets_and_Procurement_Policy|Procurement Policy]] for Authority for Large Amounts (>10k euros). I am satisfied with the transparency and documented communication with AGIO and LWG (thank you, Sarah!) and accepts this proposal.)''<br>
- <u>Craig Allan</u> ''(Fully Agree. We will not be allowed to be called a Foundation in future as that is reserved for a different corporate structure. The procedure for holding annual meetings will be a bit odd as we will have to call the meeting twice due to Belgium quorum requirements. We won't meet quorum in the 1st meeting. 2nd meeting has no quorum. Note that the meeting must be held physically at the physical location of the secretariat, but that people may attend virtually. (Yes, that's crazy))''<br>
- <u>Daniela Waltersdorfer</u> ''(I agree but... I'm worried about the statements from Craig. Are we all okay with 1.) not being call a Foundation; 2.) Note that the meeting must be held physically at the physical location of the secretariat, but that people may attend virtually ?? I suppose that for everyone agreeing, we're okay with these 2 points.)''<br>
'''1 against: '''<br>
- <u>Guillaume Rischard</u> ''(For a sum and decision like this we should compare more than one offer. LWG isn't fully happy with AGIO.''<br>
"''Note that the meeting must be held physically at the physical location of the secretariat, but that people may attend virtually. (Yes, that's crazy)''"<br>
''Well that nips it in the bud, doesn't it? I am requesting that we delay this circular by another week, and discuss this at the f2f. See the proposal by NautaDutilh on gitlab.)''<br>
|-
|''Circular by Sarah Hoffmann''.
|-
|style="text-align: left; background: white;" | <span style="color: black;">
'''Approved''' on 2024-05-06 with '''5 votes in favour''': <u>Roland Olbricht</u>, <u>Mateusz Konieczny</u>, <u>Arnalie Vicario</u>, <u>Daniela Waltersdorfer</u>, <u>Craig Allan</u> ''(I think this is a good idea. Let's do it!)''<br>
'''1 against:''' <u>Guillaume Rischard</u> ''(1000 Euros to visit an agency that has explicitly told us they can’t fund us is a very high cost, and probably not a good use of foundation money. If it’s about discussions we can have calls with them. If physical meetings make a difference, as I said, I have a UN badge and my cost to go meet them is the subway ride. We already have good connections with the UN. I fail to see what benefits to the community and foundation would justify the expense.)''
'''1 abstained:''' <u>Sarah Hoffmann</u>
|-
| ''Circular by Sarah Hoffmann. OSMF [https://osmfoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Travel_policy&oldid=11523 travel policy].''
|}
==== 2024/Res23
{| class="wikitable"
|-
| ''The OSMF Board has been requested by slice0* to review the [[Etiquette_Violations_by_slice0|ban]] placed upon him by the [[Moderation_team_for_talk_and_osmf-talk_mailing_lists|Moderation team]].''
''The Board members are asked to read the appeal email and the documents provided by the moderation team and come to a decision.''
'''''Supporting''' the appeal will cancel the ban.''<br>
'''''Not supporting''' the appeal will continue the ban.''
''Board members may abstain from voting, but are asked to explicitly vote. (Vote:Abstain).''<br>
''A simple majority of the Board - four votes - will decide this matter.''
|-
|style="text-align: left; background: white;" | <span style="color: black;">
'''Voting closes''' on 2024-05-08 with votes so far: '''7 not supporting'''.<br>
- <u>Arnalie Vicario</u><br>
- <u>Roland Olbricht</u><br>
- <u>Daniela Waltersdorfer</u><br>
- <u>Craig Allan</u><br>
- <u>Guillaume Rischard</u> ''(The user is encouraged to reflect on how they come across to other volunteers in this collective project.)''<br>
- <u>Sarah Hoffmann</u> ''(The ban contains reasonable conditions how it can be lifted. The user is invited to follow these instructions.)'' <br>
- <u>Mateusz Konieczny</u> ''(This user was blocked for failure to co-operate with the rest of the OSM community and repeated inability to communicate and take into account what people tried to explain. This block made sense and I am upholding it. There were repeated attempts to explain things to them and they failed. See discussions, block messages, diary comments. Note that block message mentions way forward for lifting ban.)'
|-
| ''Circular by Craig Allan.''
|}
''Note by Dorothea: Full name replaced with OSM username and links added.''
==== 2024/Res24 Craig Allan: Request for refund of travel costs to Frankfurt F2F 27 & 28 May 2024 ====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
| |||