Revision as of 21:04, 10 March 2021 (view source) Apm-wa (talk \| contribs) (→‎Overview) ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:24, 17 March 2021 (view source) Apm-wa (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Remaining to be done: Answering all questions posed in varous fora Mar 10-11 - Series of three BBB video conference briefings open to OSM community 8 hours apart to answer questions about data, at noon UTC, 2000 UTC, and 0400 March 11 UTC (these correspond to 0700, 1500, and 2300 EST). URL of the video conference is https://osmvideo.cloud68.co/user/all-3t3-ekg == Questions and answers == The video conference will use Microsoft Translator to interpret in real time. Attendees should download and install the Microsoft Translator app in advance if they wish to see translation. The conversation code will be provided at the beginning of the briefing. Q. How important is the takeover protection (question S1, choice 1) for a) the survey respondents who are a corporate sponsor of OSM or a commercial company using OSM data (question D1, choices 5, 6, or and b) those respondents who are neither? Is there a difference between the two groups? If yes, is it (statistically) significant? A. There is a statistically significant difference between those who answered yes and those who answered no to these two questions. I did not break out the "double no" group ("no" in both categories) because to be frank doing that complicates the problem and the difference on initial examination was not that great. You can see the numbers in the spreadsheet here. The methodology was to assign a rank of 7 to 1 for first choice, second choice, et cetera for the option "Takeover protection". I multiplied the rank of each choice times the number of observations who made that choice, then took the means and standard deviations (range of course was 1 through 7) and counted the number of observations.

2021 Survey Results: Difference between revisions

2021 Survey Results (view source)

Revision as of 02:24, 17 March 2021